-
Re: A CON majority drops to a 17% betting chance – politicalbetting.com
Game over1 -
Re: A CON majority drops to a 17% betting chance – politicalbetting.com
What, it is impossible to say that two female PMs separated by a contemptibly useless male PM are also useless? I do love this very distinctive PB gammon dressed as wokery. No bad mouthing the laydee…3 -
Re: A CON majority drops to a 17% betting chance – politicalbetting.com
amusing1 -
Re: A CON majority drops to a 17% betting chance – politicalbetting.com
They could be drawing down SIPPs rather than having bought annuities. Lots of people are what with the annuity rates on offer these days.3 -
Re: A CON majority drops to a 17% betting chance – politicalbetting.com
All a bit second guessish, isn't it? Why not ask whether it was a good idea, not whether you think x thinks it was a good idea? This strikes me as like regretting the loss of your favourite babysitte…2
