IanB2
-
Re: A 64/1 trading bet? – politicalbetting.com
Trump and Vance will only accept an effective surrender, and that they weren’t going to get. Neither of them have the appetite for days of talking around the details, when they have given themselves … (View Post)2 -
Re: A 64/1 trading bet? – politicalbetting.com
Rawnsleys argument in a sentence is that we can’t/wont rejoin until it is clearly a settled question, and with Farage leading the polls and the Tories still in the hands of his fellow travellers, tha… (View Post)6 -
Re: A 64/1 trading bet? – politicalbetting.com
Meanwhile, this morning’s Rawnsley: It will be ten 10 years this June since the referendum which that resulted in a narrow vote to quit. We’ve had more than five years of experiencing the consequence… (View Post)4 -
Re: Yes we Kam? – politicalbetting.com
There are a lot of chancers on eBay - people offering items that are obviously over-priced, for anyone in the know, but waiting for some numpty or person for whom cost is no object to click on '… (View Post)1 -
Re: Generational damage – politicalbetting.com
Total number of candidates, by party, local council elections: LAB: 4,882 (96.7%) RFM: 4,801 (95.1%) CON: 4,752 (94.2%) GRN: 4,446 (88.1%) LD: 3,929 (77.8%) TUSC: 284 (5.6%) WPB: 72 (1.4%) SDP: 48 (1… (View Post)2
