GarethoftheVale2
-
Re: In the VI polling, there’s been a marked shift to LAB – politicalbetting.com
Last time they needed 8 nominations but only the proposer and seconder were made public (View Post)2 -
Re: In the VI polling, there’s been a marked shift to LAB – politicalbetting.com
Lab wouldn't want a byelection in Amber Valley as they likely wouldn't win (View Post)1 -
Re: In the VI polling, there’s been a marked shift to LAB – politicalbetting.com
Hunt has now gone past Tugendhat despite not having declared. Bad news for Tugendhat as they are in the same lane (View Post)1 -
Re: Five days on the Next CON leader betting market – politicalbetting.com
That sounds a strong number already. If I am correct the magic number to guarantee a place in the members vote is 120 votes (a third of the electorate +1) (View Post)1 -
Re: Five days on the Next CON leader betting market – politicalbetting.com
I was thinking yesterday that that could be Tugendhat's only hope. Get enough votes to get to the final 5 and then hope for tactical voting due to being too remain-y for the members. Then hope t… (View Post)1