No - I also set out the other bit you referred to. This whole case hinges on judicial review of government powers and the wooly concept of proportionality, not the legislation itself. (View Post)

No offence but you have no idea what you’re talking about. This judgment was made by two judges. High Court judgments are often made by one judge. It’s not difficult for a ruling to be “unanimous” in… (View Post)

The High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court regularly overturn each other. It’s not about “who understands the law better”. (View Post)

(5) For the purposes of subsection (4) an organisation is concerned in terrorism if it— (a) commits or participates in acts of terrorism, (b) prepares for terrorism, (c) promotes or encourages terror… (View Post)

Because the power, passed by Parliament, does not state that the power can only be exercised if a certain amount of terrorism is committed. The organisation just has to be “concerned in terrorism, in… (View Post)