The High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court regularly overturn each other. It’s not about “who understands the law better”. (View Post)

(5) For the purposes of subsection (4) an organisation is concerned in terrorism if it— (a) commits or participates in acts of terrorism, (b) prepares for terrorism, (c) promotes or encourages terror… (View Post)

Because the power, passed by Parliament, does not state that the power can only be exercised if a certain amount of terrorism is committed. The organisation just has to be “concerned in terrorism, in… (View Post)

I actually quotes two subsections. If you read the judgement you’ll understand that the case hinges on the Home Office policy, not the legislation. It’s that policy which the court found constrained … (View Post)

I stand corrected on that point, but that doesn’t change the general principle against what you are arguing. (View Post)