Gallowgate
Gallowgate
Reactions
-
Re: This is an incredibly sad decision – politicalbetting.com
I stand corrected on that point, but that doesn’t change the general principle against what you are arguing. (View Post)1 -
Re: This is an incredibly sad decision – politicalbetting.com
That’s not how this works at all (View Post)3 -
Re: This is an incredibly sad decision – politicalbetting.com
It has been a while since I studied public law but “proportionality” has been used before by the courts to constrain public powers. I personally think that Parliament should legislate the test of pro… (View Post)1 -
Re: This is an incredibly sad decision – politicalbetting.com
Yeah, of course. The power is: Terrorism Act 2000, s3 (4) The Secretary of State may exercise his power under subsection (3)(a) in respect of an organisation only if he believes that it is concerned … (View Post)2 -
Re: This is an incredibly sad decision – politicalbetting.com
“Although some of PA's actions did constitute acts of terrorism under the Terrorism Act 2000, the nature and scale of PA's activities falling within the definition of terrorism had not yet … (View Post)3
