Foxy
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Where did you get this figure of 430k? The published figures show +204k in the 12/12 to end June. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/nov/27/net-migration-to-uk-drops-69-year-on-year-ons-says?CM… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Being Lefty is relative to the observer, who sits in the sensible midzone between Trump and Mussolini. (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Much of that increased welfare is the Triple Lock. Any party wanting to continue it at the next election is not getting my vote. (View Post)4 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
I think the case is that Juries are more likely to get it wrong than a sole judge, so your best chance if guilty is the jury trial, but the last thing you want is an error if you are not guilty. (View Post)2 -
Re: A 28% return in just over a month? – politicalbetting.com
Anyone who is financially literate could eee that both the Labour and Tory manifestos at the 24 GE were nonsense. Either major tax rises or major spending cuts or both were needed to balance the book… (View Post)2
