Foxy
-
Re: This morning I said Rachel Reeves was safe in the forthcoming reshuffle – politicalbetting.com
Yes, it's like cutting maintenance. For a year or two you can get away with it, but eventually it saps productivity. Same with the cuts to training, buildings and capital. Eventually it makes an… (View Post)3 -
Re: This morning I said Rachel Reeves was safe in the forthcoming reshuffle – politicalbetting.com
In my private work the worst payers are lawyers. I once waited 2 years to be paid for a medicolegal report. Shortly after I was paid, the same firm wanted me to do a further report. I declined it. I … (View Post)4 -
Re: This morning I said Rachel Reeves was safe in the forthcoming reshuffle – politicalbetting.com
The problem is that Ukraine doesn't get a seat at the talks. They are between Trump and Putin. A bit like the Munich talks on the Czechoslovakian crisis of 1938 featuring Brits, Germans and Fren… (View Post)1 -
Re: This morning I said Rachel Reeves was safe in the forthcoming reshuffle – politicalbetting.com
No, I think there is a genuine drop in productivity in the NHS too. It's complicated why that should be: a mix of demotivated staff, lack of investment in training, decrepit buildings that need … (View Post)4 -
Re: This morning I said Rachel Reeves was safe in the forthcoming reshuffle – politicalbetting.com
The problem is that Starmer is the most in need of reshuffling. He might be a decent Home Sec. (View Post)1
