Flatlander
-
Re: When something is both little and large – politicalbetting.com
My naughty conspiracy theory side says that he doesn't actually want to win any seats - just damage the Tories - and also wanted to get the tankie (ha!) talking point across for, er, reasons. Mo… (View Post)1 -
Re: Let’s talk about gender politics – politicalbetting.com
One way this seems to have gone badly wrong is that the computer system was seen as sufficient evidence of "missing" money on its own. There was no lifestyle evidence. If the postmaster had… (View Post)2 -
Re: Let’s talk about gender politics – politicalbetting.com
The law (wrongly) says that computers are reliable unless shown otherwise. So unless someone talked about bugs the court could only assume that there weren't any. (View Post)1 -
Re: Let’s talk about gender politics – politicalbetting.com
Indeed, but as I understand it, the court assumes that reliable does mean just that. Always right unless proven otherwise. The law needs changing. (View Post)1 -
Re: Northern Ireland [Westminster] Constituencies : Part One (Safe Seats) – politicalbetting.com
Sub for Gordon? If Kane plays, I'd take him off for Watkins if England score the first goal - to see if it stops them retreating into their own half. (View Post)1
