Fishing
-
Re: The Rachel effect? – politicalbetting.com
It should be the market, not "society", that decides how much land is allocated to new housing, as it was in the 1930s and before, when we survived somehow. At least, excluding AONBs, Natio… (View Post)3 -
Re: I think the public may not be fans of Rachel Reeves – politicalbetting.com
Pb.com has done it too. I remember once there was a thread on here about how Boris should be terrified that during the 2019 election campaign he didn't attend a televised debate and Channel 4 replace… (View Post)3 -
Re: I think the public may not be fans of Rachel Reeves – politicalbetting.com
No, we need to facilitate private sector investment and growth. Government is brilliant at investing in crap - politically dictated projects that make no economic sense, from Concorde to HS2 to ... O… (View Post)2 -
Re: The bookies are now offering odds on Trump winning in 2028/a third term – politicalbetting.com
Trump is a walking advertisement for term limits. But I oppose them. They are unnecessary and deeply anti-democratic - there is already a mechanism called "elections" which limits a politic… (View Post)1 -
Re: Is inflation the key metric for winning the general election? – politicalbetting.com
That's the trouble with half-baked cuts to government services in the name of "efficiency". They have an uncanny ability to target the expenditure worth saving, while, being designed by man… (View Post)1
