FeersumEnjineeya
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Yes, and it seems to work perfectly well. The conviction (hah!) that you have to have a prosecution and a defence pitted against each other in order to determine guilt isn't the axiom that many … (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
It would be interesting to know which approach leads to the greater number of miscarriages of justice with regard to those subsequently determined to have been incorrectly convicted or acquitted. (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Yes, that does sound interesting. In truth, I have little knowledge of the legal systems of the UK or of other countries. But it does seem to me to be strange to insist that our way of doing things i… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
No, of course not. The presumption of innocence is a fundamental legal right and an international human right enshrined in documents like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the European Co… (View Post)1 -
Re: What the public expects from the budget – politicalbetting.com
Apparently not. I'm not against charging per mile, but it seems both unfair and illogical to target only EVs and hybrids. (View Post)1