FF43
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Aren't there ANY PB'ers apart me thinking, There but for the grace of God.... (View Post)5 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
The left/right choice should be better services at a higher cost versus worse services at a lower cost, then people can decide where on the tax spectrum they want to place themselves. The problem is … (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
I'm in favour, with the emphasis on "voluntary". Some people like the structure the army gives them and flourish because of it. Volunteers are more likely to be useful too. (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
As a corrective. I believe European countries running the Roman Law/Napoleonic Code system have been moving away * from examining magistrates determining guilt towards more jury trials. I'm not … (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
I think juries have an important role in democratizing justice, particularly important in controversial cases. For example people would accept a jury allowing someone accused of child molestation to … (View Post)4