FF43
-
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
If we can't air half-baked ideas on PB, where can we do that? But most of us can acknowledge other commentators' efforts in this regard without calling them "idiotic", "deran… (View Post)1 -
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
. Apart from solar having a very marginal requirement on land that could be used for farming, I don't even understand why people object in principle. A field used to generate electricity is a hi… (View Post)2 -
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
Alien to our democracy (and to America's democracy too for that matter) is bands of armed thugs hauling people off the street because they look a bit foreign, putting them in camps that could re… (View Post)3 -
Re: A majority of Brits think World War 3 is likely in the next 5 to 10 years – politicalbetting.com
I feel a version of Hanlon's Razor applies to some of your posts about Trump: "Never attribute to intelligence that which is adequately explained by stupidity AND malice" (View Post)1 -
Re: A majority of Brits think World War 3 is likely in the next 5 to 10 years – politicalbetting.com
. I did the calculation and IRC land equivalent to 0.5% of current farmland would cover the entire electricity demand of the UK through solar - not that anyone would do that of course. The supposedly… (View Post)2