FF43
-
Re: Labour’s taxing problem – politicalbetting.com
That's what he would like to say but he can't challenge Reeves directly on the points she made. When Reeves says there's a gap of X, Y and Z, Hunt doesn't say X, Y and Z are wrong… (View Post)1 -
Re: Labour’s taxing problem – politicalbetting.com
I'm less concerned about delaying the final part to Euston (a) because I think they will do it eventually and (b) it doesn't invalidate the rest of the line. Much play is made that people d… (View Post)1 -
Re: Labour’s taxing problem – politicalbetting.com
Those "infrastructure projects" had no funding and no prospect of funding under previous and current revenue assumptions. That's why they hadn't gone anywhere under the previous g… (View Post)1 -
Re: Labour’s taxing problem – politicalbetting.com
There's an important point here. Unfunded projects aren't real projects. But taking them off the table is just as much a political decision as putting them on the table in the first place. … (View Post)1 -
Re: Labour’s taxing problem – politicalbetting.com
In that letter Hunt implies civil servants may be at fault with their reporting because he can't stack up the argument there is no gap, as Reeves claims. The point @RochdalePioneers made above. … (View Post)1