FF43
-
Re: Punters think we will have a ceasefire by the end of April but Polymarket and others might soon lose
I think the two things are somewhat correlated. If you dismiss international law as of no concern, generally you don't have a clue about what works either. (View Post)1 -
Re: Punters think we will have a ceasefire by the end of April but Polymarket and others might soon lose
Apart from anything else, surely leaders would think twice about assassinating other countries' leaders, in case it happens to them too? The Elizabeth I versus Mary scenario. (View Post)1 -
Re: Punters think we will have a ceasefire by the end of April but Polymarket and others might soon lose
The legal distinction is massive between responding to actual missile strikes against your territory and other third parties versus unprovoked attacks on other countries to assassinate their leaders.… (View Post)4 -
Re: Punters think we will have a ceasefire by the end of April but Polymarket and others might soon lose
It is an interesting question why Carney has thrown his lot in with Trump on Iran. I suspect he is an actual Bush Junior style neo-Conservative and believes this stuff. Trudeau wouldn't have sig… (View Post)1 -
Re: Punters think we will have a ceasefire by the end of April but Polymarket and others might soon lose
Could you explain why giving Mad King Trump carte blanche to bomb Iran to the stone age and kill all its leaders is in the national interest, because Kemi Badenoch sure doesn't bother to do so? … (View Post)5