FF43
-
Re: Trump v the Deep State: Who wins? – politicalbetting.com
There appear be two incompatible arguments in principle against carbon capture. Firstly net zero is a massive hoax as you have said. Secondly we shouldn't be doing CO2 under any circumstances so… (View Post)3 -
Re: Trump v the Deep State: Who wins? – politicalbetting.com
Leaving aside the politics I would say Starmer has been OK so far in the job he's appointed to do of running the country. Probably Cameron level. Which isn't a high bar admittedly, but does… (View Post)4 -
Re: Diagnosing the NHS – politicalbetting.com
Maybe will hurt them. Cameron promised no rise in VAT in the 2010 election. First thing Osborne did, increase VAT. Didn't do them any damage at all. (View Post)1 -
Re: Diagnosing the NHS – politicalbetting.com
I think Harris is a sincere candidate, to use a word bandied around. Whether she's a winning candidate depends on how much the American voter actually values sincerity. (View Post)2 -
Re: Diagnosing the NHS – politicalbetting.com
Were people talking about Hitler's "strange sincerity" back in 1930's Germany? Because this endorsement doesn't make any sense otherwise... (View Post)1