FF43
-
Re: Let’s talk about Robert Jenrick’s balls as there are betting implications – politicalbetting.com
I agree with this and should also apologise for my shortness to @eek. The moral and effectiveness cases for removing the cap nee to be made. It's to Starmer's discredit he hasn't made … (View Post)1 -
Re: A 10% return in two days and a 120% return in two days? – politicalbetting.com
Starmer certainly is ruthless but I'm not sure Sue Gray was the problem, and therefore getting rid of her would solve the problem. The problem basically is one of communication, the government e… (View Post)1 -
Re: The ConHome poll has moved the market – politicalbetting.com
There is I believe a disturbing stat that poor Canadians are more likely to undergo euthanasia than wealthy ones. (View Post)2 -
Re: Let’s talk about Robert Jenrick’s balls as there are betting implications – politicalbetting.com
I think most of the new Labour government's problems are accounted for by very poor communications. Not the spectacles/freebies clusterfuck - no amount of comms can deal with that. But the other… (View Post)1 -
Re: Let’s talk about Robert Jenrick’s balls as there are betting implications – politicalbetting.com
The bigger risk with Robert Jenrick is he may actually become PM one day. Maintaining the Conservatives in the wilderness is the lesser risk (View Post)1