FF43
-
Re: A great result for the King of the North and a very bad one for the SNP – politicalbetting.com
I agree with your trade off. However the difference is small between the outputs generated by each policy. An optimistic scenario is that Aberdeen could keep production at about half of current for f… (View Post)1 -
Re: A great result for the King of the North and a very bad one for the SNP – politicalbetting.com
There is exactly £0 additional tax revenue from Kemi's policy. Actually it's a net cost as the exploitation will need to be subsidised. It may be worth the subsidy but let's be real. (View Post)1 -
Re: A great result for the King of the North and a very bad one for the SNP – politicalbetting.com
We're talking about extracting maybe 5% more out of North Sea than we would otherwise do when production is reducing by about a third every five years. I think we should do it but it's irre… (View Post)2 -
Re: A great result for the King of the North and a very bad one for the SNP – politicalbetting.com
Nobody will bring Aberdeen's glory days back. Geology prevents it even if saving the planet isn't your thing. But it's an emotional thing. People who made a good living out of the oil … (View Post)3 -
Re: A great result for the King of the North and a very bad one for the SNP – politicalbetting.com
I would say, great for Burnham - he has a clear mandate and road to Downing Street. Great for Tories - maybe only in Aberdeen but it was a stunning result, take your wins where you can, those have be… (View Post)2