Yes. Exactly that. Because my interests are better served by a Lab+LibDem coalition than a Lab majority. If Starmer doesn't like that sort of tactical voting, he could, I dunno... endorse PR? (View Post)

Labour: "If you don't vote for us, you're a Tory." Right, ok, that's a sucky system. We should change it. Labour: "We will not countenance changing the system." Sig… (View Post)

Let me try and explain it in words of no more than three syllables. I'm concerned with who forms the government, not who my MP is. Right now it looks like there are two plausible outcomes: a Lab… (View Post)

I'm genuinely puzzled why Starmer seems to be going out of his way to alienate progressives (for want of a better word) who could make the difference in so many marginals. The kerfuffle about PR… (View Post)

Likewise, they use the term "efficiency" when they really mean "stop dedicating any money at all to solving the problem". Particularly prominent in the post-2010 Conservative era. (View Post)