Eabhal
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Meh. It's not a huge issue imo - you'll still likely be popping in for a service. The bigger problem is how it affects long distance, rural journeys where there isn't an alternative - … (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
There's a "polluter pays" justification too. In a city in Edinburgh, there are significant costs to tourism, particularly in regard to housing but also the way we trash our public park… (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Sunak tried mandatory National Service or "compulsory volunteering". Young people are, understandably, against slavery - particularly when Jeremy Clarkson got so excited by the prospect of … (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Just completely incoherent. Untaxed property wealth is one of the biggest inhibitors to social mobility in this country. And the rate charge on a tiny flats on Teesside is still going to be way highe… (View Post)1 -
Re: A 28% return in just over a month? – politicalbetting.com
The thing that baffles me is they didn't do any tidying up either. And added some new policies that will cause a mess going forward to (particularly the complicated mansion tax thing). Does any … (View Post)3
