Eabhal
-
Re: I did not have truthful relations with those answers – politicalbetting.com
Different denominators. First two is entire working age population, unemployment is just labour force (excludes the inactive). I think you need to use them as a set because they each reveal and conce… (View Post)1 -
Re: I did not have truthful relations with those answers – politicalbetting.com
Employment rate, when Labour got in v now: 74.7 v 75 Inactivity rate: 21.9 v 21 Unemployment: 4.2 v 4.9 Small moments but something interesting going on there. (View Post)2 -
Re: I did not have truthful relations with those answers – politicalbetting.com
It’s funny how the economic indicators for Labour haven’t been bad at all. Not brilliantly good either, but it wasn’t so long ago that some people on PB were predicting an IMF bailout. In fairness, a… (View Post)3 -
Re: I did not have truthful relations with those answers – politicalbetting.com
The curious thing about this is how disinterested people are. No chatter in the office, not even in the top 10 most read articles on the BBC. I think it’s mainly because the country has entirely give… (View Post)1 -
Re: Brexit effect: employment – politicalbetting.com
How is it implausible? This kind of thinking ignores the experience of thousands of UK businesses. There were genuine, tangible trade barriers put up as a result of Brexit. Our politicians could (wou… (View Post)2
