Eabhal
-
Re: Assessing SEND – politicalbetting.com
It’s a very cool idea - but it doesn’t solve the spring/neap cycle, and so the baseline power would be a couple of GW at an absolute maximum (guessing), and you’d have to build them all around the UK… (View Post)3 -
Re: Assessing SEND – politicalbetting.com
Leave it to the market to decide unless there is a national security issue. It’s all very complicated too - we need our resident O&G expert but you can only pick and choose which bits to extract … (View Post)1 -
Re: Assessing SEND – politicalbetting.com
What's mad is that even accepting most of our energy will be exported south of the border, something like 40% in the Highlands was lost to curtailment. We are turning turbines off even while the… (View Post)1 -
Re: Assessing SEND – politicalbetting.com
The fundamental flaw with that table is it compares the marginal cost of gas with the total cost of renewables. A like-for-like comparison would be to drop (almost) all the CfD costs from renewables,… (View Post)4 -
Re: Assessing SEND – politicalbetting.com
It's great having people in the know like ydoethur and Richard_Tyndall on PB - but that doesn't mean you should take what they say as gospel. That's not to accuse them of lying - just … (View Post)6
