Eabhal
Eabhal
Reactions
-
Re: A 10% return in two days and a 120% return in two days? – politicalbetting.com
I think the money is better spent on people actually working for a living than freebies for Rolex-wearing millionaire pensioners. The salary for train drivers reflects the supply and demand for labou… (View Post)2 -
Re: A 10% return in two days and a 120% return in two days? – politicalbetting.com
The most annoying thing about it is that, for once, we actually have a government 1) making an investment and 2) making that investment in the north. That should be unequalified good news. But they… (View Post)1 -
Re: A 10% return in two days and a 120% return in two days? – politicalbetting.com
Labour are in danger of having a worse record on climate change and energy than the Conservatives (or at least, Con-LD coalition with Davey as the minister). Their record on coal > gas > wind w… (View Post)2 -
Re: A 10% return in two days and a 120% return in two days? – politicalbetting.com
Yes, I think this is fair. But not sensible for climate change mitigation. Climate change is happening happening now and we need to reduce emissions as quickly as possible; moving from coal to gas wa… (View Post)1 -
Re: Let’s talk about Robert Jenrick’s balls as there are betting implications – politicalbetting.com
That's asylum seekers, not all immigrants. And the fact we prevent them from working does not help with their contribution to the economy. Remember that the vast majority of immigrants come here… (View Post)1
