The question is a dog that doesn't bark. It matches their popularity; if it didn't, one campaign would be trying to exploit the fact by splitting off conflicted supporters. (View Post)

It certainly inspires in me the intended emotion of terror, but maybe not directed as intended. (View Post)

From Wilson up to to 1988, it was normal for presidents to win with more than 80% of the electoral votes, and Bush nearly managed it. Then Clinton won with 43% of the popular vote, and since him it h… (View Post)

There is certainly evidence that recent changes have been Trump -> DK, which would make sense if the voters are shy (it seems to have been what happened in 2016). (View Post)

What a useless political party. Forget new horizons, this will be the Brexit of brown Windsor soup and the great British sausage. (View Post)