DavidL
DavidL
Reactions
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
My understanding is that the big changes on pensions is the limitation on salary sacrifice schemes which may eventually produce a few billion a year in tax (depending on how people react to the chang… (View Post)4 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Even this year, where net migration is expected to fall to only (!!) 430k that is an increase of roughly 0.6% in our population, all other things being equal. That makes per capita growth less than 1… (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
I can't read that article but it seems like the usual over heated bollocks you get from Heath. In reality, to rework the old joke, Reeves has moved from being indecisive to being not so sure. (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
From the bits I have seen it was a better than average LOTO speech. Responding to the budget with minimal notice is one of the toughest jobs of the LOTO ( I've never really understood why it is not t… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Surely you could have stopped there after the first sentence! Thanks for the link. (View Post)1
