DavidL
DavidL
Reactions
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
I must say that I find it astonishing that you might have a jury trial for something as trivial as that. If that is the state of play in England there may be more in the arguments for reform than I h… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Thank you @Selebian. I had a sneaking suspicion that this observation would not be immensely popular amongst the PB selectorate! (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Ah but just think of those magnificent shoulders you can develop whilst so generously supporting your fellow citizens! It must give you a warm glow inside. (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Perhaps we are asking the wrong people about how to reduce the backlog? (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
My understanding is that the big changes on pensions is the limitation on salary sacrifice schemes which may eventually produce a few billion a year in tax (depending on how people react to the chang… (View Post)4
