Cookie
Cookie
Reactions
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
I think there's a bit more to it than that. Having juries is a defence against 'but this is the process'. The fewer actual humans you involve, the greater the risk of the processing wi… (View Post)7 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Still enjoying this. For the benefit of the thread, this is the man who taught TUD the essentials of Microsoft Excel: (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Because that's where most of the government's leaks seem to go to. (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
That really deserves more than the one like I am able to give it. Edit: I've just looked Finn Russell up - because your fact rang a bell - and I'm reminded of this lovely phrase on Wikipedi… (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Well in those terms, not unreasonable. And you got the Who in their pomp. (View Post)2
