Even if the legislation turns watertight, is there anything to prevent it being taken back to the Supreme Court and delayed while the Court considers whether it is watertight? (View Post)

The irony is that however catastrophic something was, someone on the Internet will still think it "wasn't far from what was needed". (View Post)

Or his great-grandson would have become prime minister and cooked up a vote-winning scheme to send other people to Rwanda. (View Post)

But we already know how much we're paying the Rwandans per head. It doesn't need time to reveal that. All it needs is for the electors to be told clearly the facts of the matter: (1) This only makes … (View Post)

Incredible that people hold forth on things they don't understand at all. (View Post)