Trying to be serious for a moment - the reason for the Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Court of Appeal was that people sent to Rwanda would be at risk of "refoulement" in view o… (View Post)

If we're going to change the law to declare it's safe for Rwanda to ship them back to wherever, why not change the law to declare it's safe for us to ship them back to wherever? Then we wouldn't need… (View Post)

The judgment today referred to three acts of parliament and four international conventions, including the ECHR. But beyond that it commented: "It may be that the principle of non-refoulement als… (View Post)

But we are actually talking about something real here. Whether people are going to be safe if they are sent to Rwanda. Whether they are killed, beaten, imprisoned or raped is not really an airy-fairy… (View Post)

Coming soon - a manifesto commitment to hold back the tide? (View Post)