Charles
-
Re: The front pages are pretty bad for Hancock – politicalbetting.com
“There’s no evidence they are from Russia and China. Let that sink it” Yup. It’s sunk in. It means that there’s no evidence that they’re from Russia or China. Can you categorically rule out that Russ… (View Post)1 -
Re: The front pages are pretty bad for Hancock – politicalbetting.com
I clearly move in the wrong circles 😳 (View Post)1 -
Re: The front pages are pretty bad for Hancock – politicalbetting.com
My assumption is it’s a long running affair It’s why she was appointed as an unofficial/unpaid aide And then when people asked what she was doing there was made a non-executive director at the depart… (View Post)3 -
Re: The front pages are pretty bad for Hancock – politicalbetting.com
Because they were idiots in Derbyshire (View Post)1 -
Re: The front pages are pretty bad for Hancock – politicalbetting.com
Why would Hunt take the job? He has the status to go for the top job when Boris crashes in flames (View Post)2
