Charles
-
Re: Contrasting betting charts for two very different by-elections – politicalbetting.com
Surely it’s m>f that might get offended. After all they have become women but are not able to become pregnant which undermines their womanhood? Seems a daft thing to get worked up about (View Post)1 -
Re: It’s surely less than a 74% chance that the CON will win both? – politicalbetting.com
It becomes political when they hold up the decision making process because they aren’t getting their own way (View Post)1 -
Re: It’s surely less than a 74% chance that the CON will win both? – politicalbetting.com
It’s not objectionable at all. But @OldKingCole’s original contention was that scientists have “no axe to grind”. I disagree with that, even though I have no issue with them having axes or, even, gri… (View Post)3 -
Re: It’s surely less than a 74% chance that the CON will win both? – politicalbetting.com
Individual scientists have their own agendas. Susan Mickie for instance thinks government control of society is a good thing. Then that other guy who thinks that it is immoral to boost in the UK befo… (View Post)1 -
Re: It’s surely less than a 74% chance that the CON will win both? – politicalbetting.com
Has NovaVax in their long and “eventful” history ever delivered anything on time and to spec? No, scrub that. Have they ever delivered anything? Or are they just a vehicle for stock boosters to bilk … (View Post)1