Casino_Royale
Reactions
-
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
That would mean murdering or at the very least acquiescing in the manslaughter of unarmed civilians. We aren't that sort of country. And I could never support it. I agree it would stop them, of cours… (View Post)5 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
I think we are essentially humbugged by international law, and our own ethics. The French will never stop them leaving, or allow us to patrol their shores to stop them leaving, and we are obligated t… (View Post)1 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
I read it, you are just frustrated. In a two or "two and a half" party system, you need 35-40%+ to win. In the general melee we have at the moment, with four or four and a half, 30% is quit… (View Post)2 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
A rogue poll is one you don't agree with. (View Post)1 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
I'd essentially vote for Matthew Syed for PM. I can't recall a single article of his with which I disagree. (View Post)1
