Carnyx
Carnyx
Reactions
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
But, as already much discussed, unfair to everyone else. Aunties, uncles, those who have less valuable estates to leave and subsidize the ones who benefit. (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Popularity is stupid. Most people except married (etc) Tory voters in the SE don't *have* estates big enough to need IHT, despite the propaganda that it would benefit everyone if those people were di… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
TBF Mr Sunak only floated the idea. Which went down like a, well, turd in a Pimms fruit bowl. He didn't get as far as trying it. (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
It's one of those things like deeds of variation and of assignation that are parsed by person of speech in DT-speak: a sensible financial arrangment for me, but stupidly ignored by you oikish prole, … (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
No, it was really called that (just in case it's not a witty pun by you). A separate dept to help Allied servicemen esp. RAF etc evade capture, or escape from PoW camps, provide maps in chessboards, … (View Post)1