Logically, surely if someone who kills someone because they are mentally ill, ie they would not have done it had they been in their right mind, *should* be released if they get better/recover? At the… (View Post)

Ah yes let's categorise people and countries and make general, sweeping and unsubstantiated claims about their skills and characteristics (View Post)

I've no doubt that is what the law intended. The costs of enforcement being lower assumes the law is effective at getting dangerous dogs out of circulation and effective as a deterrent to owners… (View Post)

There's always unintended consequences and people exploiting compensation schemes is nothing new. The problems is governments, egged on by the media and public opinion, often make knee jerk deci… (View Post)

It's not an effective solution to the problem at all, is it? Owners will still want to keep their dogs for whatever irrational reason (love of the animal, for protection/intimidation, for status… (View Post)