BluestBlue
-
Re: politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » In a State: Assessing WH2020
Does the left accept the concept of being 'necessarily excluded' for any other other group in any other context? I thought that inclusion and diversity were innate goods that must be enforc… (View Post)1 -
Re: politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » In a State: Assessing WH2020
No, it's clear that you don't want transparency, because you know it will level out the left's inbuilt advantage in the media. By all means, have all the right-wingers labelled just as… (View Post)1 -
Re: politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » In a State: Assessing WH2020
So why doesn't she just say exactly that? Ah, because that would reveal that the Government is simply following expert advice and would scuttle Labour's attack line. (View Post)1 -
Re: politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » In a State: Assessing WH2020
Exactly. If it were made law that all commentators appearing on the media must have their political affiliations explicitly labelled, the Left would shit themselves at the exposure of their biggest s… (View Post)1 -
Re: politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » In a State: Assessing WH2020
Wonderful - maybe we'll get fewer anti-Tory smears masquerading as expert commentary in the media! Well, one can dream. (View Post)3