BatteryCorrectHorse
-
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
I cannot see why they wouldn’t unless there’s no point. And so back to the government needing to pull those levers. (View Post)2 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
I agree. They need to do something that cuts across everyone. Stop the boats. (View Post)1 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
I don’t think it would suddenly make Labour be first in the polls but it would be indicative that delivery can work. And most people would see it. The other things they need to do are cut NHS waiting… (View Post)1 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
I agree with you democratically but strategically is what I was talking about. But democratically that’s why I support reducing the voting age, PR and undoing the voter ID changes. (View Post)3 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
“Still, you can't necessarily take people’s word for it when they say they are likely to vote. But Reform's local election performance is best explained by habitual nonvoters turning out in large num… (View Post)1