BartholomewRoberts
BartholomewRoberts
Reactions
-
Re: I visited IllicitEncounters.com so you don’t have to – politicalbetting.com
One in which their rights are respected, but the safeguarding of others is also respected. Which is what the Supreme Court did. Any teacher who doesn't understand the concept of safeguarding, sh… (View Post)2 -
Re: Phallic Drift – politicalbetting.com
How do you ever police safeguarding? You set in place policies and procedures, and if someone thinks those policies or procedures are being broken there is a named individual or a safeguarding email … (View Post)3 -
Re: Phallic Drift – politicalbetting.com
This is the problem, some extremists want to deny that there is anything "male" about a "trans woman" at all. But it's not true, and Cyclefree, FWS et al have recognised that… (View Post)2 -
Re: Phallic Drift – politicalbetting.com
Total bullshit. They never could previously use single sex spaces and it was people making an error in what the law means that meant they temporarily could. People making an error in law then the cou… (View Post)1 -
Re: Phallic Drift – politicalbetting.com
It's not fascism to have single sex spaces that are required for safeguarding reasons being restricted to those they exist to safeguard. (View Post)1
