BartholomewRoberts
BartholomewRoberts
Reactions
-
Re: I visited IllicitEncounters.com so you don’t have to – politicalbetting.com
If they're male and have a penis they should be in a male prison. The GRC is not relevant for safeguarding purposes. How they "live their lives" is not relevant for safeguarding purpos… (View Post)3 -
Re: I visited IllicitEncounters.com so you don’t have to – politicalbetting.com
Bans don't need to be policed to exist. The absolutism is that the law is on their side, so if someone is breaking the law, they can object - and won't face disciplinary action for objectin… (View Post)1 -
Re: I visited IllicitEncounters.com so you don’t have to – politicalbetting.com
Not exactly. Pubs need to apply for longer licensing hours still and have it on their license. The presumption that longer hours would be rejected was abolished during the Blair years, but all premis… (View Post)1 -
Re: I visited IllicitEncounters.com so you don’t have to – politicalbetting.com
One in which their rights are respected, but the safeguarding of others is also respected. Which is what the Supreme Court did. Any teacher who doesn't understand the concept of safeguarding, sh… (View Post)2 -
Re: Phallic Drift – politicalbetting.com
How do you ever police safeguarding? You set in place policies and procedures, and if someone thinks those policies or procedures are being broken there is a named individual or a safeguarding email … (View Post)3
