Australia, Canada and New Zealand exist just fine without being ECHR members. Why are we so uniquely incapable of implementing our own fundamental rights? Australia can also extradite criminals to th… (View Post)

The ECHR in 1948 was a set of principles, no court. Those principles were in the UK implemented by Parliament. Nothing wrong with going back to that. Let Parliament be the ultimate guarantor of our r… (View Post)

No Parliament can bind its successors, any agreements are always subject to change. The fact we are in Europe and they are not is what I said was irrelevant. (View Post)

No it does not. If you are well off and came from a poor background but need to commercially rent a home, or well off and came from a poor background but get a social home, then why should the states… (View Post)

I hate cliff edges as a matter of principle, there should be no maximum that leads to being forced out. However I don't see why it should be subsidised, whoever lives there that can afford it sh… (View Post)