BartholomewRoberts
BartholomewRoberts
Reactions
-
Re: The latest next PM betting – politicalbetting.com
The law defines their action as terrorism with or without the Home Secretary's involvement. The group are proscribed terrorists because the Home Secretary proscribed them following their acts of… (View Post)1 -
Re: The latest next PM betting – politicalbetting.com
As was done in this case. Following the same procedures that are followed in other cases too. (View Post)1 -
Re: The latest next PM betting – politicalbetting.com
You're close to having a point, those objecting to the rule of law, many of them passionate supporters of "the rule of law" otherwise are raging hypocrites driven by their antipathy to… (View Post)2 -
Re: The latest next PM betting – politicalbetting.com
So the provisions within the law were met. What violence in the UK had the other 2 groups done? And were they more or less violent than PA? Violence includes damage to property as PA did. Why aren… (View Post)1 -
Re: The latest next PM betting – politicalbetting.com
Yes, I think Blair's law was authoritarian and should be repealed, I said so. Many of Blair's laws were authoritarian and he got his way many attempts that were defeated were even worse. Ho… (View Post)1
