BartholomewRoberts
BartholomewRoberts
Reactions
-
Re: Breaking her word – politicalbetting.com
Well said. I will support this Act as better than the status quo, but not remotely far enough and I would want to abolish most of the "safeguards" in it through legislation at a future date… (View Post)1 -
Re: Breaking her word – politicalbetting.com
No its not, we've had a lengthy discussion within many posts, many of which have been lengthy, or short and snappy. The points have been challenged. Any post refuting all the points in one go wo… (View Post)1 -
Re: Breaking her word – politicalbetting.com
What a pathetic argument. People are entitled to make whatever damned arguments they want. That's free speech. We should not reject good laws to prevent people from making arguments or speaking.… (View Post)1 -
Re: Breaking her word – politicalbetting.com
Well I have specifically refused the substance in the header that claims falsely that Canada shows an expansion in the legislation. It does not, Canada passed new legislation following its own democa… (View Post)1 -
Re: Breaking her word – politicalbetting.com
It was new primary legislation, it was not an expansion of the old legislation via the old legislation without going through Parliament. If that's their choice, that's their choice, and the… (View Post)1
