BartholomewRoberts
BartholomewRoberts
Reactions
-
Re: The latest next PM betting – politicalbetting.com
Yes, of course it was, until they got proscribed due to the terrorism they engaged in. Does the law forbid expressing support for proscribed groups? Yes. Did PA exceed the threshold for getting prosc… (View Post)1 -
Re: The latest next PM betting – politicalbetting.com
When have I ever railed against a terrorist group who've engaged in terrorism under the law being added to the list of proscribed groups? Under the law we have, PA absolutely are terrorists and … (View Post)1 -
Re: The latest next PM betting – politicalbetting.com
That's the law Blair passed, yes. I've repeatedly railed against Blair's illiberalism and said I'd be comfortable with this law being repealed. These guys 100% are terrorists unde… (View Post)1 -
Re: The latest next PM betting – politicalbetting.com
Indeed. And there is absolutely no question that Palestine Action 100% meets that definition. If you want to repeal the law, then do so, or campaign for that. But acting as if the law should be appli… (View Post)2 -
Re: The latest next PM betting – politicalbetting.com
What people think and what the law says aren't always the same thing and ignorance is no excuse under the law. Terrorism includes doing serious damage to property with a political motivation in … (View Post)2
