BartholomewRoberts
BartholomewRoberts
Reactions
-
Re: Robert Jenrick, a man of letters? – politicalbetting.com
In the real world many democracies have their own domestic court as their supreme court and not an international one like the ECHR. (View Post)1 -
Re: Robert Jenrick, a man of letters? – politicalbetting.com
Trade disputes can [and sometimes do] last decades and be resolved via negotiations, no need for an undemocratic court. International relations should be an arena for negotiators and diplomats, not l… (View Post)1 -
Re: Robert Jenrick, a man of letters? – politicalbetting.com
I have no qualms with international treaties that are implemented domestically by domestic Parliament and subject to change by our Parliament. Any that supersede or override Parliament are utterly un… (View Post)1 -
Re: Robert Jenrick, a man of letters? – politicalbetting.com
Any changes can be voted through Parliament if we are not in the ECHR. If we are, then any changes need to be voted through by every single country. Foreign countries should have no say under our law… (View Post)1 -
Re: Robert Jenrick, a man of letters? – politicalbetting.com
There was no referendum to adopt it, so no reason to need a referendum to leave it either. Australia, Canada and New Zealand are all democracies, are they not? And none of them are in the ECHR. What … (View Post)2
