It didn't work on Starmer as he had arguments he could use to turn his history into a strength, prosecuting terrorists etc. He's used his history many, many times in his speeches as a reaso… (View Post)

You don't. You have a political debate and if Starmer wants to defend his actions, he can do. If he wants to ignore it, he can do. If the public agree with Jenrick and decide to turf out Starmer… (View Post)

So its not OK to criticise Rudy Guiliani? Nobody is above criticism, certainly not lawyers. (View Post)

Not to forget that Starmer has frequently used his case history to campaign on. "I've prosecuted terrorists". Whats sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. If he's happy to c… (View Post)

It's not remotely Trumpian to criticise people for their choices. It's happened since time immemorial. Cab rank is one thing, and it would be disingenuous to criticise that. But what people… (View Post)