I could see something going like: “We don’t really have sufficient data on efficacy for older age groups. Only 8% were in that group” “Only 8%?” “Yes. So we’re only approving it for the under 65s at … (View Post)

That is an explicitly untrue statement. You are eliding "We do not have explicit proof as to the degree by which it does or does not stop people passing on the virus so we are being cautious&quo… (View Post)

Some here: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2775646?guestAccessKey=b5738d71-4ef0-48c0-9130-d675e62d1fa8&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_link… (View Post)

From the REACT-1 study: "However, we found evidence for non-constant growth within round 8a; a logistic regression model with a smooth term gave ΔAIC > 6 compared with one using only a consta… (View Post)

They must have done a metric shit-tonne of very rapid liposuction with an industrial-strength vacuum. (View Post)