Skip to content

If there were an election tomorrow the Tories would be banjaxed – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,710
edited September 26 in General
If there were an election tomorrow the Tories would be banjaxed – politicalbetting.com

Sky's @SamCoatesSky breaks down new YouGov polling which would, if proven to be correct, give Reform UK the keys to No 10 ??Full story ? https://t.co/QVi0fbmgQ7 pic.twitter.com/AFxJXYBRO3

Read the full story here

«134567

Comments

  • BattlebusBattlebus Posts: 1,631
    All part of the Nigel for PM narrative. Who is funding this lot?
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,949
    Tbf, if they oppose ID cards (online or actual) and promise to repeal any inflicted on us by Starmer then I'm much likelier to vote for them than I would've been a week ago.

    Same goes for the Lib Dems.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 53,025
    Third, like the Tories, if they are lucky!
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 57,300
    Battlebus said:

    All part of the Nigel for PM narrative. Who is funding this lot?

    A rogue or bad poll is one where you disagree with the result?
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 34,671
    Every cloud has a silver lining. Jenrick gone! Time to jump ship?

    Time to call these Reformers to account.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 53,025

    Tbf, if they oppose ID cards (online or actual) and promise to repeal any inflicted on us by Starmer then I'm much likelier to vote for them than I would've been a week ago.

    Same goes for the Lib Dems.

    Worth a read, referencing back to Labour’s previous go on ID cards:

    https://drhow.substack.com/p/id-cards-on-a-loop?r=2feid8
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 34,671
    Battlebus said:

    All part of the Nigel for PM narrative. Who is funding this lot?

    The TV licence fee payers?
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 57,300
    edited September 26
    An interesting plot of data from the poll



    So an overall majority for Reform is odds *off*
  • Battlebus said:

    All part of the Nigel for PM narrative. Who is funding this lot?

    No need for it to be anyone shadowy.

    News media are all desperate for eyeballs, so it's in their interests to hype things up to get and keep the public's attention.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 14,635
    edited September 26
    Morning all,
    Green hold in Katie Lams seat in Kent with a split ConRef vote. Tight fight in the Weald likely!
    Rolvenden & Tenterden West (Ashford) Council By-Election Result:

    🌍 GRN: 36.5% (-16.9)
    ➡️ RFM: 31.6% (New)
    🌳 CON: 27.9% (-10.3)
    🔶 LDM: 2.6% (New)
    🌹 LAB: 1.4% (-7.0)

    Green HOLD.
    Changes w/ 2023.
  • Good morning

    Lots of love for @HYUFD, his wife and family on here after his awful news of the still birth of their first child

    This is the forum at its best and I still feel shock and dismay at his news

    Continuing love and thoughts

    On topic

    Ironically the conservatives would almost certainly be in a coalition with Reform if this result happened, though 4 years is a longtime for Farage to keep up his far right rhetoric

    On the poll, I disagree.

    Should this happen then you would have the Tory leader peacocking about thinking they hold the balance of power. Despite getting scunnered that they get a seat at the cabinet table etc.

    Farage would tell them to Do One. Challenge the Tories to vote them down - because if you got a Tory leader whipping their MPs to vote against Reform they would be gone quickly. To say nothing of being reduced to taxi size at the next election.

    No coalition would be needed.

    Though this scenario is one of the more optimistic for the Tories. 45 seats? A lot compared to some polls...
  • An interesting plot of data from the poll



    So an overall majority for Reform is odds *off*

    Nigel as PM but unable to get anything done would be top larfs. Just the sort of larfs I'd rather be observing from the safety of a different country.
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 11,994
    edited September 26
    Good to finally get an MRP. We've been in the dark about whether Reform's vote share would translate into seats; at these proportions, it looks like they could just squeeze in.

    I appreciate constituency-level analysis with an MRP is a bit silly, but if the Conservatives really are on track to lose the Scottish border seats to Reform then they are doomed.
  • isamisam Posts: 42,734
    edited September 26
    If Reform were to fall slightly short of an overall majority, but able to govern with support from the Conservatives, would that be more likely to be reported as a failure or the most seismic moment in British electoral history?
  • Good morning

    Lots of love for @HYUFD, his wife and family on here after his awful news of the still birth of their first child

    This is the forum at its best and I still feel shock and dismay at his news

    Continuing love and thoughts

    On topic

    Ironically the conservatives would almost certainly be in a coalition with Reform if this result happened, though 4 years is a longtime for Farage to keep up his far right rhetoric

    On the poll, I disagree.

    Should this happen then you would have the Tory leader peacocking about thinking they hold the balance of power. Despite getting scunnered that they get a seat at the cabinet table etc.

    Farage would tell them to Do One. Challenge the Tories to vote them down - because if you got a Tory leader whipping their MPs to vote against Reform they would be gone quickly. To say nothing of being reduced to taxi size at the next election.

    No coalition would be needed.

    Though this scenario is one of the more optimistic for the Tories. 45 seats? A lot compared to some polls...
    Besides, the record of junior coalition partners at the subsequent election is pretty awful. Maximum blame, minimum credit. Still, "kingmakers" sounds so much better than "suckers".
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 6,446

    Tbf, if they oppose ID cards (online or actual) and promise to repeal any inflicted on us by Starmer then I'm much likelier to vote for them than I would've been a week ago.

    Same goes for the Lib Dems.

    Your post highlights the big problem for Labour . I very much doubt those who support the IDs are going to vote Labour because of this . But I suspect this will be a red line for some the other way .

    Labour would have to show tangible results that ID cards have significantly reduced illegal migration and illegal working and made life easier for citizens for this policy to have any hope of helping them .

    Given how long this system will take to set up and then a grace period to allow everyone to get it there’s little chance of this being up and running by the time of the next election .

    If the May elections are as is likely a disaster for Labour and this ID policy is seen to be a part of that then Starmer is in real trouble . It also means that anyone who wants to challenge Starmer would have had to be against the new ID system from the start otherwise they’re already starting from a bad position.
  • Can we also consider the key question - what is a "Reform majority?"

    Normally you elect MPs and if one party has a majority of MPs they can control the Commons and thus form the government.

    But the lived reality of the Farage party - in whichever guise - is that they fall out and fall apart at pace. We're already seeing this at council level. Nationally its hard to keep track of how many MPs they have in any given week. And we have an official splinter in the form of AdvanceUK.

    Whatever majority Farage got would not be stable...
  • Tbf, if they oppose ID cards (online or actual) and promise to repeal any inflicted on us by Starmer then I'm much likelier to vote for them than I would've been a week ago.

    Same goes for the Lib Dems.

    I’d suggest Reform’s attitude to ID cards is of a somewhat mercurial nature.

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971327874616656040?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971289547804963182?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971326532179329136?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    Prediction, if one of the dystopian versions of our future involves Labour enacting ID cards and Reform forming a government in 2029, the latter wouldn’t lift a finger to repeal the legislation.
    Well, maybe a motion to put more Union flags on it.
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 4,061
    I reckon they'd lose quite a few of those initial MPs in the first 6 months and more as back-stories started coming out (assuming they hadn't been exposed during the campaign).
  • Eabhal said:

    Good to finally get an MRP. We've been in the dark about whether Reform's vote share would translate into seats; at these proportions, it looks like they could just squeeze in.

    I appreciate constituency-level analysis with an MRP is a bit silly, but if the Conservatives really are on track to lose the Scottish border seats to Reform then they are doomed.

    We are picking up a lot of anger amongst farmers towards the Tories. A LOT of anger. Not helped by peacocking Tories who think farmers are their block vote who will never leave despite being royally shafted by their government.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,949

    Tbf, if they oppose ID cards (online or actual) and promise to repeal any inflicted on us by Starmer then I'm much likelier to vote for them than I would've been a week ago.

    Same goes for the Lib Dems.

    I’d suggest Reform’s attitude to ID cards is of a somewhat mercurial nature.

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971327874616656040?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971289547804963182?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971326532179329136?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    Prediction, if one of the dystopian versions of our future involves Labour enacting ID cards and Reform forming a government in 2029, the latter wouldn’t lift a finger to repeal the legislation.
    Well, maybe a motion to put more Union flags on it.
    To clarify, I meant I was more likely to vote Conservative (or Lib Dem).

    I'm still not voting Reform.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 45,388
    edited September 26

    Tbf, if they oppose ID cards (online or actual) and promise to repeal any inflicted on us by Starmer then I'm much likelier to vote for them than I would've been a week ago.

    Same goes for the Lib Dems.

    I’d suggest Reform’s attitude to ID cards is of a somewhat mercurial nature.

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971327874616656040?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971289547804963182?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971326532179329136?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    Prediction, if one of the dystopian versions of our future involves Labour enacting ID cards and Reform forming a government in 2029, the latter wouldn’t lift a finger to repeal the legislation.
    Well, maybe a motion to put more Union flags on it.
    To clarify, I meant I was more likely to vote Conservative (or Lib Dem).

    I'm still not voting Reform.
    Fair enough, more my misunderstanding.
    My point about slippery Nige and co still stands.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 16,202

    Good morning

    Lots of love for @HYUFD, his wife and family on here after his awful news of the still birth of their first child

    This is the forum at its best and I still feel shock and dismay at his news

    Continuing love and thoughts

    On topic

    Ironically the conservatives would almost certainly be in a coalition with Reform if this result happened, though 4 years is a longtime for Farage to keep up his far right rhetoric

    I hadn't heard that. Massive sympathy to HYUFD and his wife.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 47,543

    Tbf, if they oppose ID cards (online or actual) and promise to repeal any inflicted on us by Starmer then I'm much likelier to vote for them than I would've been a week ago.

    Same goes for the Lib Dems.

    I’d suggest Reform’s attitude to ID cards is of a somewhat mercurial nature.

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971327874616656040?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971289547804963182?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971326532179329136?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    Prediction, if one of the dystopian versions of our future involves Labour enacting ID cards and Reform forming a government in 2029, the latter wouldn’t lift a finger to repeal the legislation.
    Well, maybe a motion to put more Union flags on it.
    They'd put union flags over the concentration camps...
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,949
    Incidentally, just been reading the BBC 'what we know' section on ID cards. Apparently, it'll be on people's phones.

    I despise smartphones, and don't have one. At least, not yet. Maybe I'll end up being forced to get one thanks to this genius move.
  • Battlebus said:

    All part of the Nigel for PM narrative. Who is funding this lot?

    A rogue or bad poll is one where you disagree with the result?
    Nothing to do with the quality of the poll, which seems accurate according to all recent evidence. The problem is Farage is not being subjected to ANY scrutiny by some mainstream media channels whereas every else is.

    Farage's catastrophic paracetamol-autism interview with Ferrari on LBC led every LBC bulletin on Wednesday and was picked up by ITV. Absolutely nothing from the BBC. Zip, nada, nothing. Chris Mason's fawning eulogy on the nature of the Reform Conference was quite remarkable and drove a coach and horse through the BBC's impartiality remit.

    Call the beggars out!
    The other day, in the Times, a below-the-line commentator referred to Chris Mason as the Uriah Heep of British political correspondents. That image is going to stick with me......
  • BattlebusBattlebus Posts: 1,631
    edited September 26

    Incidentally, just been reading the BBC 'what we know' section on ID cards. Apparently, it'll be on people's phones.

    I despise smartphones, and don't have one. At least, not yet. Maybe I'll end up being forced to get one thanks to this genius move.

    What seems to be missing with this ID stuff is an announcement in Parliament first together with any Impact Assessment. Seems to be kite flying / regaining the narrative / kicking Burham off the front pages.

    The Burnham thing was odd in that he would have been taken more seriously had he been a PM MP. Perhaps he saw his chances of a safe seat being compromised by No. 10 and decided to lash out.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 8,164
    edited September 26
    So it looks like Keir has finally decided his government’s narrative is to fight the politics of grievance.

    I’m glad he’s finally settled on something 15 months in. How long will this relaunch last?

    Not exactly inspirational is it, that your governments purpose is being against something rather than what it might do itself?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 53,025
    Eabhal said:

    Good to finally get an MRP. We've been in the dark about whether Reform's vote share would translate into seats; at these proportions, it looks like they could just squeeze in.

    I appreciate constituency-level analysis with an MRP is a bit silly, but if the Conservatives really are on track to lose the Scottish border seats to Reform then they are doomed.

    The MRP seems a lot more cautious about a Reform majority than the standard UNS models from the National VI polls. Which illustrates the power of tactical voting in individual seats, and the incumbency advantage many MPs will have.
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 7,298

    Incidentally, just been reading the BBC 'what we know' section on ID cards. Apparently, it'll be on people's phones.

    I despise smartphones, and don't have one. At least, not yet. Maybe I'll end up being forced to get one thanks to this genius move.

    I wonder if it might be quite popular, given the number of times you have to prove your ID and the buggeration it can cause.

    Often not even a passport will do and you have to provide utility bills and the like.

    Im not sure what your objections are to having a smartphone, but having a small personal computer with you is great. Not only is it great on the move for maps, tickets, train schedules, sat nav, digital radio etc but I do most of my small personal computing tasks on it. I rarely make calls or send/receive texts.
  • DopermeanDopermean Posts: 1,663

    Tbf, if they oppose ID cards (online or actual) and promise to repeal any inflicted on us by Starmer then I'm much likelier to vote for them than I would've been a week ago.

    Same goes for the Lib Dems.

    I’d suggest Reform’s attitude to ID cards is of a somewhat mercurial nature.

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971327874616656040?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971289547804963182?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971326532179329136?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    Prediction, if one of the dystopian versions of our future involves Labour enacting ID cards and Reform forming a government in 2029, the latter wouldn’t lift a finger to repeal the legislation.
    Well, maybe a motion to put more Union flags on it.
    Why they have to trumpet this a digital ID card rather than just quietly creating one large central database is the big question.

    It's popularity will depend on how competently it's administered. If they award this to Capita then Westminster could be ablaze within months of it going live.
    The trickle of stories about ID theft to take out Universal Credit loans etc and the ensuing Kafkaesque nightmares does not bode well.

    I suspect that the big announcement rather than implementing it quietly will prove to be a major mis-step by Starmer.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 53,403

    Can we also consider the key question - what is a "Reform majority?"

    Normally you elect MPs and if one party has a majority of MPs they can control the Commons and thus form the government.

    But the lived reality of the Farage party - in whichever guise - is that they fall out and fall apart at pace. We're already seeing this at council level. Nationally its hard to keep track of how many MPs they have in any given week. And we have an official splinter in the form of AdvanceUK.

    Whatever majority Farage got would not be stable...

    Though departures from Reform are almost always to the even further right, such as the batshit crazy stuff that comes from Lowe. Would such MPs bring down Farage in a VONC and precipitate a further GE, one likely to lose them their seats and significance?
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 34,671
    Dopermean said:

    Tbf, if they oppose ID cards (online or actual) and promise to repeal any inflicted on us by Starmer then I'm much likelier to vote for them than I would've been a week ago.

    Same goes for the Lib Dems.

    I’d suggest Reform’s attitude to ID cards is of a somewhat mercurial nature.

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971327874616656040?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971289547804963182?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971326532179329136?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    Prediction, if one of the dystopian versions of our future involves Labour enacting ID cards and Reform forming a government in 2029, the latter wouldn’t lift a finger to repeal the legislation.
    Well, maybe a motion to put more Union flags on it.
    Why they have to trumpet this a digital ID card rather than just quietly creating one large central database is the big question.

    It's popularity will depend on how competently it's administered. If they award this to Capita then Westminster could be ablaze within months of it going live.
    The trickle of stories about ID theft to take out Universal Credit loans etc and the ensuing Kafkaesque nightmares does not bode well.

    I suspect that the big announcement rather than implementing it quietly will prove to be a major mis-step by Starmer.
    Have we heard from David Davis yet? I am assuming a vanity by election in Goole and Pocklington is nailed on.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 23,508
    I'd rather have an id card in my wallet than a digital id on a phone.

    Will that be an option for those without a smartphone, I wonder.

  • As the Labour Party conference begins, can we take a breath and appreciate what we are seeing?

    15 months after winning a HUGE landslide the government are now polling distant 2nd at best - or 3rd at worst. With Starmer the least popular PM ever (and that's with recent stiff opposition). With rebellion in the ranks and the King in the North on manoeuvres.

    What is the government's Big Plan to win back support and transform the political agenda? Mandatory digital ID cards! How to keep digging from the bottom of the pit.

    Are they this disconnected from reality already?
  • boulayboulay Posts: 7,521

    Incidentally, just been reading the BBC 'what we know' section on ID cards. Apparently, it'll be on people's phones.

    I despise smartphones, and don't have one. At least, not yet. Maybe I'll end up being forced to get one thanks to this genius move.

    From what Nandy is saying on the radio now it looks like a central gov database where everyone is on (I guess if it’s like here then you can go into gov services online through it and make payments, change details etc etc in one simple place) and it would list their status confirming they could work (maybe a photo and social security number or whatever you call it would make sense).

    An employer can log in and check you are real and allowed to be here.

    You can have a version of it on your mobile but she is saying that it won’t be compulsory to have.

    That’s the general gist I got.
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 7,298
    Battlebus said:

    Incidentally, just been reading the BBC 'what we know' section on ID cards. Apparently, it'll be on people's phones.

    I despise smartphones, and don't have one. At least, not yet. Maybe I'll end up being forced to get one thanks to this genius move.

    What seems to be missing with this ID stuff is an announcement in Parliament first together with any Impact Assessment. Seems to be kite flying / regaining the narrative / kicking Burham off the front pages.

    The Burnham thing was odd in that he would have been taken more seriously had he been a PM MP. Perhaps he saw his chances of a safe seat being compromised by No. 10 and decided to lash out.
    Maybe he can get a rule change through the Conference. Although I would think they would be unlikely to elect a non-MP when in power, even if the rules allowed it

    When a party has been out of power for 11 years, people in a devolved authority should be a good source of experience*. I know he is old and probably wanted to retire, but in other circumstances it would have surely been sensible to offer Mark Drakeford a cabinet role.

    *er, OK, Boris
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,681
    The point of this, of course, is that most professional lawyers might simply refuse to pursue a political prosecution which is entirely baseless in law.

    Lindsay Halligan, the newly-installed US Attorney prosecuting James Comey at President Trump's direction, is an insurance attorney and a Miss Colorado finalist. She has never prosecuted a case.
    https://x.com/KyleClark/status/1971396750771728672

    Unless there are mass resignations at the DOJ in protest, then it's anther step towards authoritarianism, where the law is secondary to the whims of the president.
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 11,994

    Eabhal said:

    Good to finally get an MRP. We've been in the dark about whether Reform's vote share would translate into seats; at these proportions, it looks like they could just squeeze in.

    I appreciate constituency-level analysis with an MRP is a bit silly, but if the Conservatives really are on track to lose the Scottish border seats to Reform then they are doomed.

    We are picking up a lot of anger amongst farmers towards the Tories. A LOT of anger. Not helped by peacocking Tories who think farmers are their block vote who will never leave despite being royally shafted by their government.
    Appreciate that but farmers even in the most rural parts of the country only represent a small proportion of the electorate. More people are farmer-adjacent, but even in Aberdeenshire manufacturing is a much bigger sector.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,826
    To me, Lib Lab coalition/working agreement looks a pretty likely prospect, if the Lib Dems are up for it.
    You'd think they would do anything to stop Farage, but I always feel there's an undercurrent of extreme dislike of Labour amongst some Lib Dems I can't quite fathom...
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 53,025

    Can we also consider the key question - what is a "Reform majority?"

    Normally you elect MPs and if one party has a majority of MPs they can control the Commons and thus form the government.

    But the lived reality of the Farage party - in whichever guise - is that they fall out and fall apart at pace. We're already seeing this at council level. Nationally its hard to keep track of how many MPs they have in any given week. And we have an official splinter in the form of AdvanceUK.

    Whatever majority Farage got would not be stable...

    Even before those questions arise, Reform is going to have to put up 600+ unknown, untested candidates from a membership only very recently created. Some of those people are going to have both real world and social media pasts that will cause no end of problems for Reform during the heat of a general election campaign, and it will be an interesting question how many of their runners and riders resign or have to be disowned by their party before they get to the finishing post.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 21,192
    If thirs poll was closer to the election and therefore worth taking seriously it would be worth considering the weapons available to the governing party

    1. Rejoin the EU without a referendum. That would kill Farage at a stroke
    2. Introduce PR (Ditto)
    3. Deleted (Bad taste)
    4. (Ditto)

  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,996
    Nigelb said:

    The point of this, of course, is that most professional lawyers might simply refuse to pursue a political prosecution which is entirely baseless in law.

    Lindsay Halligan, the newly-installed US Attorney prosecuting James Comey at President Trump's direction, is an insurance attorney and a Miss Colorado finalist. She has never prosecuted a case.
    https://x.com/KyleClark/status/1971396750771728672

    Unless there are mass resignations at the DOJ in protest, then it's anther step towards authoritarianism, where the law is secondary to the whims of the president.

    Didn’t some resign because they wouldn’t prosecute the case?
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 6,446
    Labour comms are a real mess this morning . Nancy seems to be all over the place as to who exactly will have to have the ID.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 53,403

    Battlebus said:

    Incidentally, just been reading the BBC 'what we know' section on ID cards. Apparently, it'll be on people's phones.

    I despise smartphones, and don't have one. At least, not yet. Maybe I'll end up being forced to get one thanks to this genius move.

    What seems to be missing with this ID stuff is an announcement in Parliament first together with any Impact Assessment. Seems to be kite flying / regaining the narrative / kicking Burham off the front pages.

    The Burnham thing was odd in that he would have been taken more seriously had he been a PM MP. Perhaps he saw his chances of a safe seat being compromised by No. 10 and decided to lash out.
    According to the BBC, he wants it introduced by the end of the parliament.

    That looks very optimistic to me given the time needed to consult, enact the primary legislation and to build and test everything.

    I still think the lack of mandate to do anything in this sphere is deeply concerning.
    The way to implement it is to make it voluntary, and free. A lot of folk would find it useful if it became an option when opening a bank account, renting accommodation, buying a house, voting in elections etc. I suspect the adoption rate would be very high. There would still be ways to live without it, such as carrying passport or driving licence etc, just increasingly awkward.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,681
    Nigelb said:

    The point of this, of course, is that most professional lawyers might simply refuse to pursue a political prosecution which is entirely baseless in law.

    Lindsay Halligan, the newly-installed US Attorney prosecuting James Comey at President Trump's direction, is an insurance attorney and a Miss Colorado finalist. She has never prosecuted a case.
    https://x.com/KyleClark/status/1971396750771728672

    Unless there are mass resignations at the DOJ in protest, then it's anther step towards authoritarianism, where the law is secondary to the whims of the president.

    We are seeing a sweeping campaign of intimidation and pressure against political opposition in the United States. "A senior Justice Department official has instructed more than a half dozen U.S. attorneys’ offices to draft plans to investigate a group funded by George Soros, the billionaire Democratic donor who President Trump has demanded be thrown in jail."
    https://x.com/shashj/status/1971326756692054355
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 56,496
    Nigelb said:

    The point of this, of course, is that most professional lawyers might simply refuse to pursue a political prosecution which is entirely baseless in law.

    Lindsay Halligan, the newly-installed US Attorney prosecuting James Comey at President Trump's direction, is an insurance attorney and a Miss Colorado finalist. She has never prosecuted a case.
    https://x.com/KyleClark/status/1971396750771728672

    Unless there are mass resignations at the DOJ in protest, then it's anther step towards authoritarianism, where the law is secondary to the whims of the president.

    It appears that we are moving on to the show trial period of Trumpism. A prosecution brought by someone with no criminal experience because the President instructs it against someone he detests is getting a long, long way from the rule of law.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 10,782
    edited September 26
    boulay said:

    Incidentally, just been reading the BBC 'what we know' section on ID cards. Apparently, it'll be on people's phones.

    I despise smartphones, and don't have one. At least, not yet. Maybe I'll end up being forced to get one thanks to this genius move.

    From what Nandy is saying on the radio now it looks like a central gov database where everyone is on (I guess if it’s like here then you can go into gov services online through it and make payments, change details etc etc in one simple place) and it would list their status confirming they could work (maybe a photo and social security number or whatever you call it would make sense).

    An employer can log in and check you are real and allowed to be here.

    You can have a version of it on your mobile but she is saying that it won’t be compulsory to have.

    That’s the general gist I got.
    "Palantir Technologies, the data integration and surveillance company co-founded by Trump ally Peter Thiel, has gradually secured at least 24 contracts across key UK public institutions, from the NHS to local councils, often bypassing normal procurement processes."
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 53,025
    rkrkrk said:

    To me, Lib Lab coalition/working agreement looks a pretty likely prospect, if the Lib Dems are up for it.
    You'd think they would do anything to stop Farage, but I always feel there's an undercurrent of extreme dislike of Labour amongst some Lib Dems I can't quite fathom...

    Aside from Labour being essentially an authoritarian party full of machine politicians interested only in ends rather than means, I can’t imagine. Looking at how Labour councillors act and behave with majority control might help shed some light on it, and in those councils where they have acquired control, comparing that with the things they said prior is often very instructive.
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 4,061

    Incidentally, just been reading the BBC 'what we know' section on ID cards. Apparently, it'll be on people's phones.

    I despise smartphones, and don't have one. At least, not yet. Maybe I'll end up being forced to get one thanks to this genius move.

    I wonder if it might be quite popular, given the number of times you have to prove your ID and the buggeration it can cause.

    Often not even a passport will do and you have to provide utility bills and the like.

    Im not sure what your objections are to having a smartphone, but having a small personal computer with you is great. Not only is it great on the move for maps, tickets, train schedules, sat nav, digital radio etc but I do most of my small personal computing tasks on it. I rarely make calls or send/receive texts.
    What is not great is the monthly bill.
  • All of these polls show all 4 nations voting differently.

    A Federal UK is the obvious solution.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 16,219
    boulay said:

    Incidentally, just been reading the BBC 'what we know' section on ID cards. Apparently, it'll be on people's phones.

    I despise smartphones, and don't have one. At least, not yet. Maybe I'll end up being forced to get one thanks to this genius move.

    From what Nandy is saying on the radio now it looks like a central gov database where everyone is on (I guess if it’s like here then you can go into gov services online through it and make payments, change details etc etc in one simple place) and it would list their status confirming they could work (maybe a photo and social security number or whatever you call it would make sense).

    An employer can log in and check you are real and allowed to be here.

    You can have a version of it on your mobile but she is saying that it won’t be compulsory to have.

    That’s the general gist I got.
    That’s scarcely more than a DBS check. To be honest it surprises me that data isn’t already available.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 53,403
    rkrkrk said:

    To me, Lib Lab coalition/working agreement looks a pretty likely prospect, if the Lib Dems are up for it.
    You'd think they would do anything to stop Farage, but I always feel there's an undercurrent of extreme dislike of Labour amongst some Lib Dems I can't quite fathom...

    I think the more difficult aspect of supporting a minority Labour government is that such a government would have just lost a massive majority, indicating rejection by the electorate.

    Supporting such a government would be anti-democratic and also a poisoned chalice at the next GE.
  • Eabhal said:

    Eabhal said:

    Good to finally get an MRP. We've been in the dark about whether Reform's vote share would translate into seats; at these proportions, it looks like they could just squeeze in.

    I appreciate constituency-level analysis with an MRP is a bit silly, but if the Conservatives really are on track to lose the Scottish border seats to Reform then they are doomed.

    We are picking up a lot of anger amongst farmers towards the Tories. A LOT of anger. Not helped by peacocking Tories who think farmers are their block vote who will never leave despite being royally shafted by their government.
    Appreciate that but farmers even in the most rural parts of the country only represent a small proportion of the electorate. More people are farmer-adjacent, but even in Aberdeenshire manufacturing is a much bigger sector.
    Sure! Just pointing out that the rural farmer Tory vote may be on shaky ground...
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 20,298

    Can we also consider the key question - what is a "Reform majority?"

    Normally you elect MPs and if one party has a majority of MPs they can control the Commons and thus form the government.

    But the lived reality of the Farage party - in whichever guise - is that they fall out and fall apart at pace. We're already seeing this at council level. Nationally its hard to keep track of how many MPs they have in any given week. And we have an official splinter in the form of AdvanceUK.

    Whatever majority Farage got would not be stable...

    The new Right does seem particularly fractious.

    On the other hand, if Farage leads Reform to 300+ seats and all the splinter parties are obliterated, then that might serve as an object lesson to potential rebels.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 6,446
    So it seems Nandy is saying you won’t have to use the ID to access services but it now seems that you will still have to have it .
  • Roger said:

    If thirs poll was closer to the election and therefore worth taking seriously it would be worth considering the weapons available to the governing party

    1. Rejoin the EU without a referendum. That would kill Farage at a stroke
    2. Introduce PR (Ditto)
    3. Deleted (Bad taste)
    4. (Ditto)

    "With a Melon???"


  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 4,061

    As the Labour Party conference begins, can we take a breath and appreciate what we are seeing?

    15 months after winning a HUGE landslide the government are now polling distant 2nd at best - or 3rd at worst. With Starmer the least popular PM ever (and that's with recent stiff opposition). With rebellion in the ranks and the King in the North on manoeuvres.

    What is the government's Big Plan to win back support and transform the political agenda? Mandatory digital ID cards! How to keep digging from the bottom of the pit.

    Are they this disconnected from reality already?

    Not already; they're this disconnected from reality still. Never came to terms with it in opposition.

    Being disconnected from reality is the prevailing zeitgeist.
  • DavidL said:

    Nigelb said:

    The point of this, of course, is that most professional lawyers might simply refuse to pursue a political prosecution which is entirely baseless in law.

    Lindsay Halligan, the newly-installed US Attorney prosecuting James Comey at President Trump's direction, is an insurance attorney and a Miss Colorado finalist. She has never prosecuted a case.
    https://x.com/KyleClark/status/1971396750771728672

    Unless there are mass resignations at the DOJ in protest, then it's anther step towards authoritarianism, where the law is secondary to the whims of the president.

    It appears that we are moving on to the show trial period of Trumpism. A prosecution brought by someone with no criminal experience because the President instructs it against someone he detests is getting a long, long way from the rule of law.
    It's *fascism*. Openly now. Trump's regime tick every box which differentiates a fascist from a common or garden authoritarian.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 57,300
    Roger said:

    If thirs poll was closer to the election and therefore worth taking seriously it would be worth considering the weapons available to the governing party

    1. Rejoin the EU without a referendum. That would kill Farage at a stroke
    2. Introduce PR (Ditto)
    3. Deleted (Bad taste)
    4. (Ditto)

    As someone who voted Remain, 1) is delusional. It would turbocharge Farage
    2) is admitting defeat for the Labour Party.

    The problem the government has is that it is mired in Process. Nothing can be done because it takes 5+years to get the legal comedies sorted out.

    Among other things, 1) would require accession talks with the EU. There is simply no way to get those done inside a decade. There would also be none-stop legal challenges in the U.K. courts.

    2) would require a project to rework the UK electoral system. Can’t be done inside 5 years. Again, all the legal cases

  • boulayboulay Posts: 7,521
    Foxy said:

    Battlebus said:

    Incidentally, just been reading the BBC 'what we know' section on ID cards. Apparently, it'll be on people's phones.

    I despise smartphones, and don't have one. At least, not yet. Maybe I'll end up being forced to get one thanks to this genius move.

    What seems to be missing with this ID stuff is an announcement in Parliament first together with any Impact Assessment. Seems to be kite flying / regaining the narrative / kicking Burham off the front pages.

    The Burnham thing was odd in that he would have been taken more seriously had he been a PM MP. Perhaps he saw his chances of a safe seat being compromised by No. 10 and decided to lash out.
    According to the BBC, he wants it introduced by the end of the parliament.

    That looks very optimistic to me given the time needed to consult, enact the primary legislation and to build and test everything.

    I still think the lack of mandate to do anything in this sphere is deeply concerning.
    The way to implement it is to make it voluntary, and free. A lot of folk would find it useful if it became an option when opening a bank account, renting accommodation, buying a house, voting in elections etc. I suspect the adoption rate would be very high. There would still be ways to live without it, such as carrying passport or driving licence etc, just increasingly awkward.
    I use a system here called one.gov and had to set it up with the usual bank type set ups with uploading some proof of address docs, passport and then the whole proof of life filming yourself. I have an ap I can log into but I can do everything I need re completing tax returns, paying taxes, fees etc or any other govt services/admin.

    I wouldn’t have a problem with an employer or a estate agent or bank having controlled access to a page generated from it proving who I was and I was allowed to live and work here as would save loads of time as would cover their arses as well that they have done a valid check. It would remove the need for lots of different companies etc to have to collect and store your docs like passport copies.

    So for example in the UK if there was a central gov system where you load up your standard sort of DD/KYC docs and you have an account number and an ap firstly you can go in to one place and update addresses, pay tax etc in one easy place.

    There could then be an option for others to check - you go in to open a new bank account and the banker enters your gov ID number on the gov site which sends you an access permission notification on your phone which you authorise and the banker can see all your official details, passport, etc etc, download a confirmation from the system and save themselves and you a ton of paperwork.

    Similarly if someone is going for a job the employer has to check the system and see that you have permission to work in UK and download the confirmation. The employer knows they aren’t illegally employing and they don’t have a leg to stand on if they don’t bother with the check.

    The ap could also have an official photo ID that covers driving licence so you can use it for buying age restricted goods, ID for flights in UK, Ireland etc, as it saves having a plastic card on you if you so wish but is secure enough to trust.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 10,782
    edited September 26
    “It will be compulsory if you want to work in this country, so you’ll have to show that to be able to prove that you have the right to work,” Lisa Nandy told BBC Breakfast."
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,681

    Nigelb said:

    The point of this, of course, is that most professional lawyers might simply refuse to pursue a political prosecution which is entirely baseless in law.

    Lindsay Halligan, the newly-installed US Attorney prosecuting James Comey at President Trump's direction, is an insurance attorney and a Miss Colorado finalist. She has never prosecuted a case.
    https://x.com/KyleClark/status/1971396750771728672

    Unless there are mass resignations at the DOJ in protest, then it's anther step towards authoritarianism, where the law is secondary to the whims of the president.

    Didn’t some resign because they wouldn’t prosecute the case?
    Erik Siebert, Halligan's predecessor (and a Trump appointee, in January this year) was effectively fired when he declined to prosecute for lack of evidence.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 53,403
    boulay said:

    Foxy said:

    Battlebus said:

    Incidentally, just been reading the BBC 'what we know' section on ID cards. Apparently, it'll be on people's phones.

    I despise smartphones, and don't have one. At least, not yet. Maybe I'll end up being forced to get one thanks to this genius move.

    What seems to be missing with this ID stuff is an announcement in Parliament first together with any Impact Assessment. Seems to be kite flying / regaining the narrative / kicking Burham off the front pages.

    The Burnham thing was odd in that he would have been taken more seriously had he been a PM MP. Perhaps he saw his chances of a safe seat being compromised by No. 10 and decided to lash out.
    According to the BBC, he wants it introduced by the end of the parliament.

    That looks very optimistic to me given the time needed to consult, enact the primary legislation and to build and test everything.

    I still think the lack of mandate to do anything in this sphere is deeply concerning.
    The way to implement it is to make it voluntary, and free. A lot of folk would find it useful if it became an option when opening a bank account, renting accommodation, buying a house, voting in elections etc. I suspect the adoption rate would be very high. There would still be ways to live without it, such as carrying passport or driving licence etc, just increasingly awkward.
    I use a system here called one.gov and had to set it up with the usual bank type set ups with uploading some proof of address docs, passport and then the whole proof of life filming yourself. I have an ap I can log into but I can do everything I need re completing tax returns, paying taxes, fees etc or any other govt services/admin.

    I wouldn’t have a problem with an employer or a estate agent or bank having controlled access to a page generated from it proving who I was and I was allowed to live and work here as would save loads of time as would cover their arses as well that they have done a valid check. It would remove the need for lots of different companies etc to have to collect and store your docs like passport copies.

    So for example in the UK if there was a central gov system where you load up your standard sort of DD/KYC docs and you have an account number and an ap firstly you can go in to one place and update addresses, pay tax etc in one easy place.

    There could then be an option for others to check - you go in to open a new bank account and the banker enters your gov ID number on the gov site which sends you an access permission notification on your phone which you authorise and the banker can see all your official details, passport, etc etc, download a confirmation from the system and save themselves and you a ton of paperwork.

    Similarly if someone is going for a job the employer has to check the system and see that you have permission to work in UK and download the confirmation. The employer knows they aren’t illegally employing and they don’t have a leg to stand on if they don’t bother with the check.

    The ap could also have an official photo ID that covers driving licence so you can use it for buying age restricted goods, ID for flights in UK, Ireland etc, as it saves having a plastic card on you if you so wish but is secure enough to trust.
    Is that Finland?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,681

    Can we also consider the key question - what is a "Reform majority?"

    Normally you elect MPs and if one party has a majority of MPs they can control the Commons and thus form the government.

    But the lived reality of the Farage party - in whichever guise - is that they fall out and fall apart at pace. We're already seeing this at council level. Nationally its hard to keep track of how many MPs they have in any given week. And we have an official splinter in the form of AdvanceUK.

    Whatever majority Farage got would not be stable...

    The new Right does seem particularly fractious.

    On the other hand, if Farage leads Reform to 300+ seats and all the splinter parties are obliterated, then that might serve as an object lesson to potential rebels.
    Yes, a lot of people tend to forget their political principles if it means risking their jobs.
  • Eabhal said:

    Good to finally get an MRP. We've been in the dark about whether Reform's vote share would translate into seats; at these proportions, it looks like they could just squeeze in.

    I appreciate constituency-level analysis with an MRP is a bit silly, but if the Conservatives really are on track to lose the Scottish border seats to Reform then they are doomed.

    We are picking up a lot of anger amongst farmers towards the Tories. A LOT of anger. Not helped by peacocking Tories who think farmers are their block vote who will never leave despite being royally shafted by their government.
    Didn't farmers shaft themselves over Brexit?
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 11,994

    Eabhal said:

    Eabhal said:

    Good to finally get an MRP. We've been in the dark about whether Reform's vote share would translate into seats; at these proportions, it looks like they could just squeeze in.

    I appreciate constituency-level analysis with an MRP is a bit silly, but if the Conservatives really are on track to lose the Scottish border seats to Reform then they are doomed.

    We are picking up a lot of anger amongst farmers towards the Tories. A LOT of anger. Not helped by peacocking Tories who think farmers are their block vote who will never leave despite being royally shafted by their government.
    Appreciate that but farmers even in the most rural parts of the country only represent a small proportion of the electorate. More people are farmer-adjacent, but even in Aberdeenshire manufacturing is a much bigger sector.
    Sure! Just pointing out that the rural farmer Tory vote may be on shaky ground...
    Agree. It's just a continual frustration of mine when people in the central belt talk about the rest of the country as if it's all just teuchters and tweed.
  • Roger said:

    If thirs poll was closer to the election and therefore worth taking seriously it would be worth considering the weapons available to the governing party

    1. Rejoin the EU without a referendum. That would kill Farage at a stroke
    2. Introduce PR (Ditto)
    3. Deleted (Bad taste)
    4. (Ditto)

    As someone who voted Remain, 1) is delusional. It would turbocharge Farage
    2) is admitting defeat for the Labour Party.

    The problem the government has is that it is mired in Process. Nothing can be done because it takes 5+years to get the legal comedies sorted out.

    Among other things, 1) would require accession talks with the EU. There is simply no way to get those done inside a decade. There would also be none-stop legal challenges in the U.K. courts.

    2) would require a project to rework the UK electoral system. Can’t be done inside 5 years. Again, all the legal cases

    Are there really legal challenges out there that steep? Have we had legal challenges to the various changes to the electoral systems already imposed?

    Labour need to change the narrative. I don't say Starmer because I've already written him off. Something *big* to change direction with a new leader. PR would be a big progressive leap forward - simply adopt one of the various proportional systems already in use. Electoral Commission can get it done in time for the next election.

    As for yerp, they won't let us back in. Not with Ingsoc on the rise. That isn't the exercise. It's to utterly transform the political narrative. Brexit has made us poorer, more isolated, more exposed to migration etc etc etc and its all Farage's fault.

    The fanbois will be outraged, but the concept is that you get all the people who are voting Reform because they are poorer, more isolated and fed up with migration to recognise that its all Brexit...
  • “It will be compulsory if you want to work in this country, so you’ll have to show that to be able to prove that you have the right to work,” Lisa Nandy told BBC Breakfast."

    I simply do not see this in place before the next GE and if it is to stop the boats then it is not relevant
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 6,446

    Eabhal said:

    Good to finally get an MRP. We've been in the dark about whether Reform's vote share would translate into seats; at these proportions, it looks like they could just squeeze in.

    I appreciate constituency-level analysis with an MRP is a bit silly, but if the Conservatives really are on track to lose the Scottish border seats to Reform then they are doomed.

    We are picking up a lot of anger amongst farmers towards the Tories. A LOT of anger. Not helped by peacocking Tories who think farmers are their block vote who will never leave despite being royally shafted by their government.
    Didn't farmers shaft themselves over Brexit?
    Yes and now want to be shafted even more by voting for Reform who have said they’ll tear up any new deal with the EU .
  • Roger said:

    If thirs poll was closer to the election and therefore worth taking seriously it would be worth considering the weapons available to the governing party

    1. Rejoin the EU without a referendum. That would kill Farage at a stroke
    2. Introduce PR (Ditto)
    3. Deleted (Bad taste)
    4. (Ditto)

    As someone who voted Remain, 1) is delusional. It would turbocharge Farage
    2) is admitting defeat for the Labour Party.

    The problem the government has is that it is mired in Process. Nothing can be done because it takes 5+years to get the legal comedies sorted out.

    Among other things, 1) would require accession talks with the EU. There is simply no way to get those done inside a decade. There would also be none-stop legal challenges in the U.K. courts.

    2) would require a project to rework the UK electoral system. Can’t be done inside 5 years. Again, all the legal cases

    I voted remain as well but it is utterly delusional to thing rejoin the EU would put Farage back in his box
  • As the Labour Party conference begins, can we take a breath and appreciate what we are seeing?

    15 months after winning a HUGE landslide the government are now polling distant 2nd at best - or 3rd at worst. With Starmer the least popular PM ever (and that's with recent stiff opposition). With rebellion in the ranks and the King in the North on manoeuvres.

    What is the government's Big Plan to win back support and transform the political agenda? Mandatory digital ID cards! How to keep digging from the bottom of the pit.

    Are they this disconnected from reality already?

    The lesser spotted QTWAIY.
  • Eabhal said:

    Good to finally get an MRP. We've been in the dark about whether Reform's vote share would translate into seats; at these proportions, it looks like they could just squeeze in.

    I appreciate constituency-level analysis with an MRP is a bit silly, but if the Conservatives really are on track to lose the Scottish border seats to Reform then they are doomed.

    We are picking up a lot of anger amongst farmers towards the Tories. A LOT of anger. Not helped by peacocking Tories who think farmers are their block vote who will never leave despite being royally shafted by their government.
    Didn't farmers shaft themselves over Brexit?
    Sure! But they had expectations about what would happen *after* Brexit. As a starter for 10 the Tories promised them easy trading with european markets and the replacement of CAP subsidies with a British equivalent.

    What is really angering farmers is Tory tossers gleefully thinking the farmer vote is theirs by rights whilst farmers say where's my free trade, where's my subsidy that you failed to deliver?

    Its that smug Tory arrogance winding them up as much as the financial mess many find themselves in. At least that's what they're telling us. Tories see the Tractor of Truth thing as anti-Labour. It's also anti-Tory and they're utterly tone deaf to the mess they have imposed on their former supporters.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 21,192

    Battlebus said:

    All part of the Nigel for PM narrative. Who is funding this lot?

    The TV licence fee payers?
    The genuflecting by the BBC has reached new levels. Nick Robinson interviewing the Israeli credited with blowing up 3000 Lebanese through their mobile phones interviewed him with a deference that would have embarrassed Nicholas Witchel.

    Perhaps he was holding one of his phones?
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 14,635
    A lot of very tight fights on that MRP. Tactical voting would play merry hell with the results. Delicious
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,681

    Eabhal said:

    Good to finally get an MRP. We've been in the dark about whether Reform's vote share would translate into seats; at these proportions, it looks like they could just squeeze in.

    I appreciate constituency-level analysis with an MRP is a bit silly, but if the Conservatives really are on track to lose the Scottish border seats to Reform then they are doomed.

    We are picking up a lot of anger amongst farmers towards the Tories. A LOT of anger. Not helped by peacocking Tories who think farmers are their block vote who will never leave despite being royally shafted by their government.
    Didn't farmers shaft themselves over Brexit?
    They did - and will be looking for someone else to blame.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 15,377
    Morning all.

    Have seen the tragic news from @HYUFD and his wife. It has cast a shadow over a glorious morning in rural Derbyshire.

    My thoughts and condolences to you both and I can but hope you will find strength in your faith and the support and love of friends and family.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,681

    Roger said:

    If thirs poll was closer to the election and therefore worth taking seriously it would be worth considering the weapons available to the governing party

    1. Rejoin the EU without a referendum. That would kill Farage at a stroke
    2. Introduce PR (Ditto)
    3. Deleted (Bad taste)
    4. (Ditto)

    As someone who voted Remain, 1) is delusional. It would turbocharge Farage
    2) is admitting defeat for the Labour Party.

    The problem the government has is that it is mired in Process. Nothing can be done because it takes 5+years to get the legal comedies sorted out.

    Among other things, 1) would require accession talks with the EU. There is simply no way to get those done inside a decade. There would also be none-stop legal challenges in the U.K. courts.

    2) would require a project to rework the UK electoral system. Can’t be done inside 5 years. Again, all the legal cases

    Are there really legal challenges out there that steep? Have we had legal challenges to the various changes to the electoral systems already imposed?

    Labour need to change the narrative. I don't say Starmer because I've already written him off. Something *big* to change direction with a new leader. PR would be a big progressive leap forward - simply adopt one of the various proportional systems already in use. Electoral Commission can get it done in time for the next election.

    As for yerp, they won't let us back in. Not with Ingsoc on the rise. That isn't the exercise. It's to utterly transform the political narrative. Brexit has made us poorer, more isolated, more exposed to migration etc etc etc and its all Farage's fault.

    The fanbois will be outraged, but the concept is that you get all the people who are voting Reform because they are poorer, more isolated and fed up with migration to recognise that its all Brexit...
    It would be possible to get PR implemented before the next general election, but would it be possible for this government ?
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 37,843
    Apparently Starmer believes ID cards will deter illegal migrants from trying to come to the UK by making it difficult for them to find work.Seems like wishful thinking imo.
  • Can we also consider the key question - what is a "Reform majority?"

    Normally you elect MPs and if one party has a majority of MPs they can control the Commons and thus form the government.

    But the lived reality of the Farage party - in whichever guise - is that they fall out and fall apart at pace. We're already seeing this at council level. Nationally its hard to keep track of how many MPs they have in any given week. And we have an official splinter in the form of AdvanceUK.

    Whatever majority Farage got would not be stable...

    Though Starmer got a landslide majority and there is open talk of him being replaced within about a year and he was in his first year unable to get even moderate reforms through that he said was critically important for the country.

    So Stability isn't exactly Labour's forte either.

    As for the Tories, the five years were hardly stable.

    We're not exactly in stable times for anyone.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 21,192

    Tbf, if they oppose ID cards (online or actual) and promise to repeal any inflicted on us by Starmer then I'm much likelier to vote for them than I would've been a week ago.

    Same goes for the Lib Dems.

    I’d suggest Reform’s attitude to ID cards is of a somewhat mercurial nature.

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971327874616656040?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971289547804963182?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    https://x.com/reformexposed/status/1971326532179329136?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    Prediction, if one of the dystopian versions of our future involves Labour enacting ID cards and Reform forming a government in 2029, the latter wouldn’t lift a finger to repeal the legislation.
    Well, maybe a motion to put more Union flags on it.
    To clarify, I meant I was more likely to vote Conservative (or Lib Dem).

    I'm still not voting Reform.
    Well I'm sure Labour will be sad to lose such a long standing supporter
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 10,492

    Eabhal said:

    Good to finally get an MRP. We've been in the dark about whether Reform's vote share would translate into seats; at these proportions, it looks like they could just squeeze in.

    I appreciate constituency-level analysis with an MRP is a bit silly, but if the Conservatives really are on track to lose the Scottish border seats to Reform then they are doomed.

    We are picking up a lot of anger amongst farmers towards the Tories. A LOT of anger. Not helped by peacocking Tories who think farmers are their block vote who will never leave despite being royally shafted by their government.
    Didn't farmers shaft themselves over Brexit?
    The farmers always seemed to be very angry with the EU because it gave them subsidies. I could never understand that.
  • James_MJames_M Posts: 105
    Just wanted to offer my deepest condolences to @HYUFD and his wife. My thoughts and prayers are with you at this awful time.
  • Andy_JS said:

    Apparently Starmer believes ID cards will deter illegal migrants from trying to come to the UK by making it difficult for them to find work.Seems like wishful thinking imo.

    If he'd ever had a job running a business he'd know its already the law to check ID when you employ someone and has been for decades.

    This is Home Office civil service overreach trying to get through an authoritarian policy they already wanted, and it has bugger all to do with deterring illegal migrants as those hiring them cash in hand without checking ID won't be affected by new regulations one bit.
  • boulayboulay Posts: 7,521
    Foxy said:

    boulay said:

    Foxy said:

    Battlebus said:

    Incidentally, just been reading the BBC 'what we know' section on ID cards. Apparently, it'll be on people's phones.

    I despise smartphones, and don't have one. At least, not yet. Maybe I'll end up being forced to get one thanks to this genius move.

    What seems to be missing with this ID stuff is an announcement in Parliament first together with any Impact Assessment. Seems to be kite flying / regaining the narrative / kicking Burham off the front pages.

    The Burnham thing was odd in that he would have been taken more seriously had he been a PM MP. Perhaps he saw his chances of a safe seat being compromised by No. 10 and decided to lash out.
    According to the BBC, he wants it introduced by the end of the parliament.

    That looks very optimistic to me given the time needed to consult, enact the primary legislation and to build and test everything.

    I still think the lack of mandate to do anything in this sphere is deeply concerning.
    The way to implement it is to make it voluntary, and free. A lot of folk would find it useful if it became an option when opening a bank account, renting accommodation, buying a house, voting in elections etc. I suspect the adoption rate would be very high. There would still be ways to live without it, such as carrying passport or driving licence etc, just increasingly awkward.
    I use a system here called one.gov and had to set it up with the usual bank type set ups with uploading some proof of address docs, passport and then the whole proof of life filming yourself. I have an ap I can log into but I can do everything I need re completing tax returns, paying taxes, fees etc or any other govt services/admin.

    I wouldn’t have a problem with an employer or a estate agent or bank having controlled access to a page generated from it proving who I was and I was allowed to live and work here as would save loads of time as would cover their arses as well that they have done a valid check. It would remove the need for lots of different companies etc to have to collect and store your docs like passport copies.

    So for example in the UK if there was a central gov system where you load up your standard sort of DD/KYC docs and you have an account number and an ap firstly you can go in to one place and update addresses, pay tax etc in one easy place.

    There could then be an option for others to check - you go in to open a new bank account and the banker enters your gov ID number on the gov site which sends you an access permission notification on your phone which you authorise and the banker can see all your official details, passport, etc etc, download a confirmation from the system and save themselves and you a ton of paperwork.

    Similarly if someone is going for a job the employer has to check the system and see that you have permission to work in UK and download the confirmation. The employer knows they aren’t illegally employing and they don’t have a leg to stand on if they don’t bother with the check.

    The ap could also have an official photo ID that covers driving licence so you can use it for buying age restricted goods, ID for flights in UK, Ireland etc, as it saves having a plastic card on you if you so wish but is secure enough to trust.
    Is that Finland?
    No, Jersey. I would use a similar system for the UK but bolt on third party access with authorisation to allow banks etc to check and confirm you are you.

    I can currently, and very handily even get and pay for my scallop diving permit or top up Prisoners’ bank accounts if I have any friends or family in there.

    https://one.gov.je/myservices?_ga=2.263066828.1398647101.1579509654-1748901107.1552405005&_gl=1*gudwqp*_ga*MTc5MzExNzU0OC4xNzU3NzU5NDYw*_ga_07GM08Q17P*czE3NTg4NzM3NjgkbzE0JGcxJHQxNzU4ODczNzk1JGozNSRsMCRoMA..

    There are constantly more services being added but it’s one nice easy place.

  • FossFoss Posts: 1,775
    Andy_JS said:

    Apparently Starmer believes ID cards will deter illegal migrants from trying to come to the UK by making it difficult for them to find work.Seems like wishful thinking imo.

    You’d think a former DPP would understand that some people just break the rules.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 14,635
    Vote shares on the MRP were as follows (changes from Junes MRP)
    Ref 27(+1)
    Lab 21 (-2)
    Con 17 (-1)
    LD 15 (=)
    Grn 11 (=)
    SNP 3(=)
    PC 1 (=)
  • stodgestodge Posts: 15,377
    Back to the Fridane of politics.

    The YouGov survey (is it an MRP?) is disastrous for Labour and cataclysmic for the Conservatives. Reform’s vote share at 27% would be even more “loveless” than that achieved by Starmer in July 2024. As others have suggested, trying to govern as a minority administration with 300+ new MPs will be difficult and inherently destabilising but assuming the SF MPs don’t take their seats they are only about ten short of a majority so it would require ALL the opposition parties to combine to vote them down.

    We are, I suspect, on these numbers, looking at a May 2029 election and the world will be a very different place. Subject to constitutional shenanigans, Trump will have left the White House and whether Gaza or even the Ukraine will have the salience then they do now is uncertain. Where will immigration sit in the minds of the electorate?
  • stodgestodge Posts: 15,377

    A lot of very tight fights on that MRP. Tactical voting would play merry hell with the results. Delicious

    We had this before the last election too. I’ve not looked at the constituency numbers in detail but will do so later. Reform win only six seats in London on the MRP it seems.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 53,403
    Nigelb said:

    Roger said:

    If thirs poll was closer to the election and therefore worth taking seriously it would be worth considering the weapons available to the governing party

    1. Rejoin the EU without a referendum. That would kill Farage at a stroke
    2. Introduce PR (Ditto)
    3. Deleted (Bad taste)
    4. (Ditto)

    As someone who voted Remain, 1) is delusional. It would turbocharge Farage
    2) is admitting defeat for the Labour Party.

    The problem the government has is that it is mired in Process. Nothing can be done because it takes 5+years to get the legal comedies sorted out.

    Among other things, 1) would require accession talks with the EU. There is simply no way to get those done inside a decade. There would also be none-stop legal challenges in the U.K. courts.

    2) would require a project to rework the UK electoral system. Can’t be done inside 5 years. Again, all the legal cases

    Are there really legal challenges out there that steep? Have we had legal challenges to the various changes to the electoral systems already imposed?

    Labour need to change the narrative. I don't say Starmer because I've already written him off. Something *big* to change direction with a new leader. PR would be a big progressive leap forward - simply adopt one of the various proportional systems already in use. Electoral Commission can get it done in time for the next election.

    As for yerp, they won't let us back in. Not with Ingsoc on the rise. That isn't the exercise. It's to utterly transform the political narrative. Brexit has made us poorer, more isolated, more exposed to migration etc etc etc and its all Farage's fault.

    The fanbois will be outraged, but the concept is that you get all the people who are voting Reform because they are poorer, more isolated and fed up with migration to recognise that its all Brexit...
    It would be possible to get PR implemented before the next general election, but would it be possible for this government ?
    Reform is a pro-PR party too.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 37,843

    Incidentally, just been reading the BBC 'what we know' section on ID cards. Apparently, it'll be on people's phones.

    I despise smartphones, and don't have one. At least, not yet. Maybe I'll end up being forced to get one thanks to this genius move.

    I haven't got one either and I don't intend to just because of ID cards.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 37,843

    Vote shares on the MRP were as follows (changes from Junes MRP)
    Ref 27(+1)
    Lab 21 (-2)
    Con 17 (-1)
    LD 15 (=)
    Grn 11 (=)
    SNP 3(=)
    PC 1 (=)

    The polling average at the moment has Reform on about 30% so this is on the low side, although I know many people think YouGov is more reliable than some of the others.
Sign In or Register to comment.