Options
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » If the Brexit impact papers don’t exist what were the redacted

By all account this has been another extraordinary Brexit day. As well as TMay’s troubles with the DUP we have DDavis now saying the the impact assessment papers on 58 sections of the economy simply do not exist.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
This would be hilarious if it wasn't so darned serious.
I suspect it is going to get used a lot.
It is a licence* to print money.
*Not an actual licence, and plus hubris...
I have a report like that right in front of me which undertook in March 2016 and have been constantly updating.
Astonishing.
Ed Miliband put an Islamic blasphemy law in his 2015 manifesto. It doesn't bode well for the future.
There are far too many remainers and anti-Tories in the Civil Service for the documents not to have been leaked if they were bad for Brexit. If they'd shown Brexit was good, they'd have been published on gold-embossed vellum bound in otter-skin, sat on a velvet cushion and paraded down Whitehall with a military band playing Land of Hope and Glory.
David Davis has had 17 months to get his shit together.
Did he really get high on his own product and think Brexit is the easiest thing in human history?
EDIT I dread to think how many Brexiteer points I lose by admitting that.
EDIT Actually Casino will have run away by then, so hopefully he can run the blockade to get us some good stuff. It's not like we'll have a Royal Navy left to stop him.
Mr. Jessop, to be fair, Arausio is not as well-known as it perhaps should be. It featured arguably the highest Roman death toll in any battle (Cannae was probably a little higher, but they were roughly equal).
The two Roman generals disliked one another so much they completed refused to co-operate, which was, er, brave, given they significantly outnumbered by the Cimbri, who, at this stage, had already notched up a series of massive victories over the Romans.
Bring on Corbyn, this won’t be worse, and might even be better.
Corbyn would be worse.
It looks like it is just a collation of previous studies by various bodies already in the public domain. I don't think that is any different from what DExEU have provided?
http://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/labour-administration-toppled-newcastle-borough-882394
This might be dressed up as a "transitional" arrangement but in reality it would soon become permanent.
You need to have a mind of high standards of moral hygiene like mine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_Party_(UK)_leadership_election,_2005
With Davis doing all the voices.
Do you believe this boys and girls?
Oh no we, don't.
Oh yes we do.
The two Davids actually got on quite well in the 2005 hustings although Cameron thought it was odd for Davis to leave the Shadow Cabinet to fight a one issue by election
The May and Davis line is clear, a FTA that ends free movement
https://twitter.com/LibDemLords/status/938461511235915776
You're stuck in one of your catchy phrase groves again. The hyperbole in no way matches the reality.
He would have been favourite for four consecutive Tory leadership contests, and lost every time.
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/politics/event/28051208/market?marketId=1.125574963